Sign in Create an account. Syntax Advanced Search. About us.
Objectivity of Account Data | Emerald Insight
Editorial team. Mark Sacks. Oxford University Press The first two parts of Objectivity and Insight explore the prospects for objectivity on the standard ontological conception, and find that they are not good. In Part I, under the heading of subject-driven scepticism, Sacks addresses the problem of securing epistemic reach that extends beyond subjective content. Part II, under the heading of world-driven scepticism, discusses the scope for universality of normative structure-a problem which survives even after the assumption of an epistemologically significant breach between subject and object has been rejected.
In the third part of the book Sacks introduces an alternative conception of objectivity, and shows that there is good reason to accept it.
- Discerning Our Mental Models.
- PEI Media : Alternative Insight!
- The Literary Theory Toolkit: A Compendium of Concepts and Methods?
- Students Writing in the University: Cultural and Epistemological Issues (Studies in Written Language and Literacy)!
- Sacks, Mark. Objectivity and Insight.;
- Lonergan, Bernard | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- The Adventures of Sissy Van Dyke.
This conception turns on an insight which is taken to be implicit in transcendental idealism, and responsible for its abiding appeal; but Sacks's articulation of that insight is neither idealist nor metaphysical. Skepticism, Misc in Epistemology. Edit this record. Mark as duplicate.
Bernard Lonergan (1904—1984)
Find it on Scholar. Request removal from index. Revision history. Google Books no proxy From the Publisher via CrossRef no proxy Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy.
Configure custom resolver. Christoph Hoerl - - Mind Dilemmas of Objectivity. Please note, other than in exceptional circumstances, we only publish exclusive content. We welcome constructive comments beneath our stories, but not those considered, for example, belligerent, hateful, or gratuitously insulting.
Please try and offer some form of supporting evidence for claims, especially if they are highly likely to be provocative to some other readers. We are trying to create a forum for constructive conversations, so any comment that we do not think contributes to that risks not being approved. He works with reporters and commentators on the ground across Ethiopia.